Improving SQ of Streaming

Not sure if you were thinking along the same lines Ben, the response to Franco from Antipodes does seem rather obtuse for a Kiwi :thinking:

Sure seems like the Oladra’s Clock output is something Antipodes is actively avoiding talking about (this explains why none of the reviews has any details of the Clock output, and why there’s absolutely nothing about it on Antipodes website either).

If I was in the market for something like this - streamer with synchronous output - I’d look at the Grimm MU1 instead, they seem much more open about the technical details of their platform.

Completely agreed, Anup, but the directness of a response also depends on the directness of the question :blush:

What kind of clock does the Oladra have?
vs.
I have a Vivaldi stack — does the Oladra make sense for me?

I’d add an Oladra to my system if it improves things. I’m sure Franco is similarly minded. But we’re missing a worked example of how best to do that, or if it’s even possible. I often wish more manufacturers (or dealers — take note, self!) would provide diagrams for how to hook things up. For example, the last few days I’ve been reading about subs. The more I read about connection options, high and low pass filters, the Icon Gradient box etc., the more confused I’ve been. A diagram would help in those cases too. Even if it’s just to avoid unclear reviews, conjecture on forums, and repetitive questions to [email protected] :upside_down_face:

2 Likes

Finally got the answer from Antipodes:

ā€œIt’s not compatible, the Antipodes Word Clock is a Master, and DAC connected must be run in SLAVE mode. The word clock works on multiples of 44.1 and 48. Honestly most high quality DAC’s already have a high quality clock, the benefit is for a DAC that is configurable in SLAVE mode.
Nothing wrong with two great clocks in your system.ā€

As much as I wanted to love it, it does not seem the right unit for the dCS Vivaldi stack.

Any other alternatives? Aurender N20? Others? Looking to improve the streaming section and replace the Roon Nucleus for hi-res files.

1 Like

That’s funny, seems Antipodes still refuses to mention the exact rate and port impedance involved :rofl:

For anyone who’s interested, the Hiend site in Taiwan has a review of the Oladra that goes into much more technical depth, and mentions the 22.05MHz/24MHz Clock output rates.

Just my opinion, Ethernet directly into your dCS stack is the most accurate-to-source path you can take. A Synchronous streamer can potentially equal that, and you may subjectively prefer how it sounds, but it cannot improve against directly Ethernet fed streams to your dCS (objectively speaking that is :laughing:)

Yes, the Aurender would be about the only option, if I’m not mistaken, which has a Clock-in port that you can slave to your dCS Clock, as well as standards-based dual-AES output for DXD/DSD128 compatible with dCS.

4 Likes

Thanks for doing all the digging, Franco :pray:

I live pretty close to Antipodes, and may still try an Oladra into the back of my Rossini Apex (likely AES or SPDIF) to see what happens. Unplugging my Clock will be hard to do, of course. I never shut up about how much I love that thing…

Good pics on that review, Anup. And oodles more detail than the Stereophile write-up.

1 Like

:+1: mine as well

Aurender W20SE: clock input (10MHz or WDCLK), dual AES output.

1 Like

Thanks guys. As a final note, Mark Cole at Antipodes said ā€œNothing wrong with two great clocks in your systemā€. Do you agree with this statement at least as far as a full dCS Vivaldi stack is concerned?

It seems to me that two separate clocks (and an additional external clock, which is the Mutec in my system) may only lead to confusion of signal timing and potential issues in the future but I defer to you guys who are the experts.

AES won’t work in a full Vivaldi stack because the AES output in the Upsampler is connected to the DAC. The only way to connect the Aurender seems to be USB (or potentially SPDIF).

Btw, is there a particular reason why you recommend Aurender W20SE vs N20? Thanks.

Hello Franco,

Whilst I don’t have a Vivaldi stack, I’ve just bought an Antipodes K41 to replace my current server (SGC sonicTransport i5).

As you may know, the K41 acts only as a server (there’s no player function), so I’ll be hooking it up to my Rossini Apex via the K41’s ā€˜Direct Stream’ Ethernet output.

The K41 may be worth considering to replace your Nucleus, especially as Antipodes have just upgraded the K range, incorporating some of the Oladra’s features.

This is from Mark Cole of Antipodes;

The list is…

Installing the OLADRA’s triple-cascade power supply technology in the K Series models.

Installing our proprietary high-quality isolation footers on the K Series models.

Upgrading K50, K41 and K30 Server engines with innovations used in the OLADRA.

1 Like

Thanks Jonathan. The issue with the Antipodes seems to be the clock, which is not compatible with the dCS system. I gather you don’t own (yet) a dCS clock (?)

Unless I’m missing something this sounds like either an overly rushed reply given without thinking too much or a misunderstanding of how clocks in systems work - if you have the source sync’d to one (great) clock and the DAC sync’d to a different (doesn’t matter how great) clock then that will not work reliably.

You will eventually get dropouts or glitches as the two clocks will run at slightly different speeds to each other.

If the DAC and the source (in this case the Antipodes) cannot be sync’d to the same global worldclock / wordclock then the DAC (or Upsampler depending on which device you have the Antipodes connected to) would need to sync itself to the audio input from the Antipodes - so that input would need to be set to ā€œAā€ (Audio) sync and in this case the DAC (or Upsampler) wouldn’t be using the Vivaldi clock for its input sync.

BR

Phil

2 Likes

I initially looked at the Oladra, but quite quickly decided against it because its clock output function is of no use to me, as are its various re-clocked outputs (I am only focused on the Ethernet output).

Actually, I do own a Rossini clock, which I bought at the same time as my (non Apex) Rossini…

1 Like

Thanks. So the K-41 model is just a server?

Have you compared it to the Aurender?

Yup
(I was only looking for a server).

I did consider Aurender but, as my dealer gave me a compelling offer, I went for the K41.

1 Like

It is only possible to use single AES (i.e. up to 192k) to connect the Aurender to the Vivaldi Upsampler (N20 and W20SE).
It is possible to directly connect the Aurender W20SE with dual AES to the Vivaldi DAC (i.e. all hi-res) and skip the Vivaldi Upsampler. There are two dual AES inputs on the Vivaldi DAC.

W20SE is the only Aurender with dual AES outputs.

Btw, connect a silent fanless NAS equipped with SSDs to the Ethernet, and use alternatively the Vivaldi Upsampler or the Aurender as streamer. You do not need both.

1 Like

Wouldn’t you benefit in connecting the Aurender to the Upsampler (which is in turn connected with the dac) so that all PCM files other than DSD could be upsampled?

All PCM files up to 192k could be upsampled.
Higher sample rates could been fed directly via dual AES from the W20SE to the Vivaldi DAC.

IMHO an additional external streamer will not improve SQ. Let the Vivaldi streamer do the job.

3 Likes

Exactly what I was going to say! (not knocking Antipodes in any way - they make excellent music servers, some of which come with very highly regarded streamers, but the price points are different).

3 Likes

A friend of mine suggested to try a dedicated Ethernet line for dCS before purchasing a new streamer.

He suggested to try this unit https://ztedevices.com/en-gl/mc801a/ with a 5g dedicated network. The Vivaldi would be connected to it via the SoTM Ethernet switch. No other devices would share this network.

Any thought?

Are you saying a dedicated network as in totally separate source from the internet or a dedicated leg of the network coming from the same router and split to separate your internal devices from the dcs system.

1 Like